1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

V6 Tuning Question(s)

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by FinoCJ, Feb 11, 2019.

  1. Feb 11, 2019
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,617
    I am always trying to get my engine tuned as well as possible - and that includes the combination of tuning/jetting the carb as well as adjusting timing. Overall, the engine has been running fine - really darn well from the best I can tell, but I got a few questions anyway. The main symptom that has my attention is that the engine seems to lug more than I would expect in the 1500rpm range (lets say up to about 1800rpm). When it gets up close to 2000rpm, it just hums away nicely. It cruises at 2500rpm so nicely (to my untrained ear and and seat of the pants feel). 2000-2600rpm is where I DD it mostly - and that seems to be a good sweet spot for a v6, but I wish it would pull a bit better at the lower end. With a 3 speed, its a pretty big rpm drop when shifting up a gear, and it seems I really have to push it up to close to 3000 rpm to keep the next gear close to 2000rpm. Obviously, this is exaggerated here in the mountains, but even a slight uphill incline really seems to require 2000rpm for the engine to avoid lugging. I don't know how much of this is just this engine (and getting accustomed to my modern Toyota v6 that pulls well down to 1000rpm) vs what is due to my tuning, and how much might be due to the comp cam 252 grind - which is slightly higher rpm focused than a stock cam. Additionally, I feel like my gas mileage since the rebuild has just been worse than previously (12mpg these days) and I think it might indicate I am not in the optimal range for the engine's performance. Keep in mind of course that I am running 4.88s and 33s - so that seems reasonably appropriate (although I think 5.38s would be perfect).

    I feel like it used to pull quite a bit better at the lower end, but I have messed with the tuning over the last couple years and guessing I have caused this issue myself. Right after the rebuild, I was running more advance on the initial timing (12BTDC), and also running a larger carb jet (49). Over time, I have slowly backed off the initial timing (8BTDC) as I was worried I was getting a pre-detonation misfire and I leaned out the carb (all the way to a 47 jet) as it was fouling plugs at elevation. At the same time, it drove ridiculously strong around town (but smelled rich) with the starting set-up. Given that I go from 5000' to 13,000' in the summer, I realize tuning the carb is a bit of a compromise. As I leaned out the carb it runs better at elevation, but its probably a bit lean around town. I tried running 48 jets as a compromise, but was getting plug fouling and rough running engine when wheeling at 8000-1000' so went back to 47s and never had a problem all the way to 13,000'.

    So this is just a long winded way to ask if my concerns around low end/rpm performance is probably due to me leaning it out and under-timing too much. I feel like I can't push the initial timing too far advanced given the lean fuel mixture? Seems like a richer fuel mixture allows for more timing - or is that just my mis-interpretation? And what would be the best way to bring back some of that performance given my conditions ? thanks
     
    Hellion likes this.
  2. Feb 11, 2019
    jpflat2a

    jpflat2a what's that noise?

    Hermosa, SD
    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    8,517
    My opinion is your fighting the gearing in the axles along with 33" tires, 3rd gear in the transmission, elevation, and no overdrive.
    My V6 is stock, and I always change the jets to 47 when I'm in Colorado. I've also driven there from Calif with the stock 51 jets, but I change them in camp after I arrive. I also advance the timing, no more than 10 degrees. Understand my home town here is only 875 ft in elevation.
    This has worked well for me; I've not experienced your lugging difficulties.Yes I am 5.38s with an OD; tires are 33s.
    I've also not experienced any spark plug fouling for any reason; I've only changed plugs because they might be 10 years old.
    The ones in the Jeep now are over 6 years old and have 2 Colorado trips on them.

    As a side note, my buddy had V6 4.88s 35"tires with an overdrive and I can out pull him at those elevations.

    Your plug fouling is the red flag here; why so much trouble fouling plugs ?
     
    rejeep and FinoCJ like this.
  3. Feb 11, 2019
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,469
    James - I'm with JP on this. The combo of the 33s and 4.88s (which is what I have too) isn't the best with the 3 speed and no OD. The OD makes a world of difference - I had that before going to the SM465 and kept it. The 252 Grind worked great on the motor with a stock carb, 3 spd, OD, 4.88s and 33s. The gear split was needed for sure.
     
    FinoCJ likes this.
  4. Feb 11, 2019
    Rich M.

    Rich M. Shoe salesman 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Maryland
    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,182
    Your running a single exhaust ? The V6 valves are small. These engines really wake up with dual exhaust and benefit from the scavenging effect of headers. I'm long over fenderwell headers but even with duals off iron manifolds that engine would be a completely different beast. It will lean right out, dial in 10-12° of advance and those plugs will be a nice tan. Snappy on the bottom end off idle too.
    Just my experience having tinkered with several. Have you converted to Hei ignition?
     
    FinoCJ likes this.
  5. Feb 11, 2019
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,617
    Hey thanks guys...I do have an OD and I use it quite a bit (as in I shift both levers quite a bit for a 'half-gear shift'). But here in the city it is a bit annoying to be shifting so much....You know the general pattern here: accelerate from a red light as fast as possible to 40mph, before slamming on the brakes at the next red light a block or two away. I have been driving my jeep a lot this winter - not wheeling it like in the summer - just DDing as its so much fun (new top with heated seats in the winter are AWESOME!). Maybe I am just getting so used to driving it that I am starting to try and drive it like everyone else. I have a 35mile roundtrip commmute with mix of freeway and city streets. Standard OP is to start in 1st+OD, shift to 2+OD then to 3rd, and then to 3rd+OD (if I get there before slamming on the brakes). Sometimes 2nd+OD will lug a bit if I don't run up the rpms in 1st+OD, and 2nd+OD to 3rd+OD is when it really likes to lug. 3rd+OD really does require highway cruising (65mph) and minimal incline. It drives more 'normal' going through the gears without the OD - but people like to run into the rear bumper when I shift out of 1st to 2nd at under 10mph. I thought only a 4cyl needed a safety triangle on the back - but the 33s and 4.88s are probably maxing out the v6.

    I think this is an exhaust issue...it mostly fouls the passenger bank....I have a thread from last year asking about this....it runs manifolds into a y-pipe and I think the way the y-pipe joins is not good - its more of a T where the passenger bank exhaust pipe T's into through going pipe from the drive side to tailpipe.
     
  6. Feb 11, 2019
    45es

    45es Active Member 2024 Sponsor 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    Naches, WA
    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,106
    I can't imagine 4.88s and 33s being the problem. 4.88s are the only ratio I have ever had in my jeep with same size tires and have never had an issue. I remember you discussing your exhaust and plug fouling nearly two years ago. You also mentioned your manifolds had different size ports. If you keep the single exhaust, you need to get rid of the T junction and Y the two together. Personally, I would do as Rich M. suggests.
     
    FinoCJ likes this.
  7. Feb 11, 2019
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,148
    I have the same issue around 1500 rpm....if you figure it out let me know!
     
  8. Feb 11, 2019
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,617
    you remember well...I would like to fix the exhaust...5 years ago I got rid of the fenderwell headers and shop work for bending the pipe wasn't cheap...definitely regretting I didn't know better at the time. Wonder how much it would be to cut out the T and replace with a Y...or if I could hack it together myself. Another option is maybe I just run dual exhaust to the rear with two separate pipes..but the passenger side muffler is difficult with D18 and rear gas tank.
     
  9. Feb 12, 2019
    tarry99

    tarry99 Member

    Northern California
    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2012
    Messages:
    3,784
    Elevation.........(5000-13000 ft) is quite a jump..........I've raced at Bandimere Speedway out west of Denver........the Tracks altitude is 5800 ft.......and that is mean altitude vs Density or adjusted altitude which could easily be 2000-4000 ft higher adjusted ( thinner Air ) on any given day. Absolutely brutal to run a naturally aspirated car there........ECM fuel injection not so bad.......but without bringing your own air like : ( supercharged / turbo more boost or in a bottle Nitrous) it really sucks..............in order to run there we raise the compression ratio and put the lowest set of gears we have in the rear axle to spin the motor at a higher RPM........which only helps marginally.........but the good news is that everyone else on the property that day is fighting the same conditions.

    Getting back to your Jeep........if your fouling plugs , your just not burning the fuel........Period!........you could try a little hotter plug......and more timing. And I doubt that you could ever hurt your motor up there because of the simple fact there is a shortage of Oxygen.........so what happens is the motor will just run out of the ability to create heat / BTU's and just nose over.......which creates less power.
    More timing allows for the burning / Ignition process in the combustion chamber to start earlier......if the added timing doesn't help it take a little more fuel away......( Jets , smaller accelerator pump and ramp)

    I've found the small Holley 390 to be a little easier to tune at higher elevations..........I use to Hunt Colorado for years with my CJ , so I had my little parts bag with me all the time including a air density gauge just to know how big a swing I needed to take at the tune-up..................In all my V6 builds I always advanced the camshaft 2-3 degrees to build more low end torque.....even when I ran them at sea-level!...........the camshaft timing would be the first thing I would change!
     
  10. Feb 12, 2019
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,798
    DD your jeep! Wow!
    You know my engine was resurrected from junk status twice... I may not be as discerning, but I also have the 1500 or so RPM flat spot. HEI, 4 barrel holley and cast iron manifolds with dual exhaust. I run a bit less than 10 degree advance, stock holley jets that came with the carb.

    I run 35's with 5.38 gears but no OD. You running the stock carb? I almost never open the secondaries on mine and have no issue keeping up with traffic, but then again I am not DDing on a 35 mile commute.

    I agree that your exhaust might be a point to look at.
     
    Hellion likes this.
  11. Feb 12, 2019
    70cj5134f

    70cj5134f Member

    East Tn
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2018
    Messages:
    749
    Most performance cams can be advanced 2 deg to lower the power bout 500rpm.
     
  12. Feb 12, 2019
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,617
    thanks for the feedback all...I think I have a plan - sometimes I have to write my thoughts out and then re-read it a number of times as I read all yall's comments to help my stagnant brain start functioning.
    1) I am going to deliberately and little by little bump my initial timing back up - probably going from 8BTDC (where it is now) up to 10-12BTDC (assuming no pre-detonation issues). Manifold vacuum readings suggests it likes a bit more initial timing (actually it likes a lot more 12-14BTDC, but that is what made me nervous when timing advance went all in).
    2) I will begin to address the exhaust issues as best as I can given I don't think I can rebuild the entire system at the moment ($). I will probably start with trying to grind and clean up the manifold ports - I've heard this isn't such a fun job and I am probably going to need some special hard grinding bit for my die-grinder to work on the iron manifolds. I will also get some new manifold gaskets - I don't like the fel-pro ones I can get from my local FLAPS as they are individual for each port and I feel like they don't fit or stay in place all that well. I have seen some recommended on here that look way better - don't need the gasket impeding exhaust flow.
    https://www.summitracing.com/parts/rfl-13-004/overview/make/buick
    3) I may even be able to cut-out my T-junction and replace with a y-junction....but have to learn a bit about connecting or splicing in a section of exhaust pipe. I see a lot of exhaust junk at FLAPS that slip fit together with an expanded end - but then I assume I need to weld it solid. Probably can't do that in place on the jeep and would need a lift to get the entire system in and out as a single piece.

    Another thought - how would changing the mechanical advance weights affect things. I don't really have a good way to map out how much and when the advance comes in (graph of rpm vs advance - I would probably need to get an adjustable timing light), but wondering if a softer spring would allow the mechanical advance to come in a bit earlier would help? Or maybe a softer vac advance canister - the high elevation up here limits how much vacuum can be achieved. Might be worth trying to investigate?

    Oh - and somewhere along the way I am hoping to get an eaton locker installed before the Rubicon this summer!
     
  13. Feb 12, 2019
    colojeepguy

    colojeepguy Colorado Springs

    At the foot of...
    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    7,148
    I've thought about this with mine...if the total advance comes in too soon then there could be issues with mid range power.
     
  14. Feb 12, 2019
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,469
    I've used a tune kit for HEI to adjust the curve based on an article I have somewhere. I'll see if I can post it, but basically I was looking for a smooth curve as the RMPs went up. I did the weights first, then the vacuum advance with an adjustable can there too.
     
  15. Feb 12, 2019
    70cj5134f

    70cj5134f Member

    East Tn
    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2018
    Messages:
    749
    Don't disregard the cam timing, it works,I've experienced it,(only in reverse).
    My 455 Pontiac was under cammed, it ran out of steam at 4500rpm.
    I retarded the cam 2 deg, and now she pulls all way to 5k.
    Also, slightly softer springs in the adv weight usually helps bottom.
    The cam is what determines where the power comes in!
    Not a hard job, youll need a 3 key chain and gear set, bout 50$.
    Instructions all over web on how too.
    I've built performance engines over 30 years, this is where I would start!
    Just my .02 cents!
     
  16. Feb 12, 2019
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,617
    arghhh...was under the jeep looking at a few things with regard to this thread...and found a coolant leak/puddle from the heater core....add it to the list of stuff to be fixed....
     
    Hellion likes this.
  17. Feb 13, 2019
    47v6

    47v6 junk wrecker! 2023 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    USA
    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Messages:
    5,798
    I can't find that vacuum advance article anywhere.
     
New Posts