1. Registration trouble? Please use the "Contact Us" link at the bottom right corner of the page and your issue will be resolved.
    Dismiss Notice

Dauntless V6 Swap

Discussion in 'Early CJ5 and CJ6 Tech' started by daciuk55, Dec 6, 2016.

  1. Dec 6, 2016
    daciuk55

    daciuk55 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8
    Have a 64 CJ5 with the F134/T90. What parts/ fabrication would be needed in order to swap a Dauntless V6 in?

    Thoughts:
    Transmission
    Radiator
    Engine Mounting

    Have been thinking the easiest way would be to just find a running donor this way I would have everything. Is a 70-71 significantly better than a 66-69 due to the availability of the T-14 transmission?, any other drastic differences between the two year ranges.

    Any advice would be appreciated.
     
  2. Dec 6, 2016
    Daryl

    Daryl Sponsor

    Bonney Lake, WA
    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,882
    The biggest bonus of a late 70-71 is the offset flanged rear axle. The t14 is world's better then a t86. The 71 came with a goofy one piece bellhousing but if you are swapping the whole setup in it doesn't matter . Good running donors are getting pretty hard to find.
     
  3. Dec 6, 2016
    FinoCJ

    FinoCJ 1970 CJ5 Staff Member

    Bozeman, MT
    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    Messages:
    5,654
    I believe the T86 was only around in 1966? From 67 on it was the T14. Someone is certainly free to correct me if I am wrong.
     
  4. Dec 6, 2016
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,487
    IMHO If you want a standard Jeep CJ go with a 1968-1975.
    If you want "THE BEST" then you will have to mix and match various Jeep models and vintages till you achieve exactly what you like.

    To fully understand what THE BEST is; one really needs to understand jeep progression from 1941 military inception to the end of CJ era (1985).

    To fully understand viable component interchanges one should be familiar with the various assemblies relative to the time proven standards.
    The time proven standard itself is the 1959 CJ.
    Generally speaking: The further you move away from 1959 the harder it becomes to interchange assemblies with other Jeep models and vintages.
    In other words the 1959 CJ's will directly interchange with more early and later year jeeps than any other single vintage year.
    Some 1942 parts can be a direct replacement and some 1975 parts can also become direct replacement parts.
    Nothing other than nuts and bolts remains identical to a 1959 CJ after 1975 changeover to full AMC components.
     
  5. Dec 7, 2016
    timgr

    timgr We stand on the shoulders of giants. 2022 Sponsor

    Medford Mass USA
    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2003
    Messages:
    23,596
    JMO - think about breaking the emotional attachment to your existing CJ, selling it, and buying a different CJ with the equipment that you want. If you are willing to search for the right Jeep across the whole country, I predict it will cost less, take less time, and involve less risk than converting your existing CJ-5.

    Ken (oldtime) suggests model years 1968-1975. Realize that all the CJ Jeeps from 1972 onwards are fully highway capable, with bigger brakes, better steering, and more powerful engines. The 1968-71 CJs with a V6 are a big improvement over the F134 Jeeps, but they still have the non-durable and imprecise Ross steering, and smaller (and replacement-parts-challenged) brakes. If you want a '68-71, I'd suggest you look around and find the best one you can afford, with all the popular upgrades (steering, brakes) already completed. This will be the faster, less expensive and less risky route to getting close to the Jeep that you want.

    If I wanted a CJ-5, I would look for a '72-75 with a 258, 4-speed and 4.27 gears. Again, JMO.
     
  6. Dec 7, 2016
    Keys5a

    Keys5a Sponsor

    Florida Keys
    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2014
    Messages:
    4,192
    If you have a Tuxedo Park, as your signature implies, my recommendation is to not modify it as this was kind of a special model, and it would be a shame to "lose" another one by modifying it from stock. I'm guilty of modifying mine back in the mid-70's, and am trying to return it to stock configuration.
    As mentioned previously, it would likely be cheaper, faster, and easier to find a V6 powered CJ5 than modify yours.
    -Donny
     
  7. Dec 7, 2016
    oddfirejeeper

    oddfirejeeper Active Member

    Hamilton, MI
    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,253
    i would love to have that combo in any of those years so long as it is as good as my current setup with the 71
     
  8. Dec 7, 2016
    daciuk55

    daciuk55 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8
    Thank you for the advice, did not realize what would be involved in swapping in the V6. Not looking to part with this one as I am pretty far along on the project......
    Just looking to get a little more drivability out of it. I am currently running earlier axles with 5.38s and 9" Brakes, However I do have the original Tuxedo Park axles with 4.27s and 10" brakes, I am thinking that swap may make a significant improvement in drivability.

    Day one
    [​IMG]
    Now
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Dec 7, 2016
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,487
    5.38 final drive ratio (FDR) with Warn 25% O.D. is better than 4.27 FDR without an O.D.
    In fact 5.38 FDR plus 25% O.D. is the optimum for CJ's with a 134 engine.
    Strong running Hurricane already begins to suffer if you increase FDR to 4.88 plus O.D.
     
  10. Dec 7, 2016
    daciuk55

    daciuk55 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    8
    So you would not recommend swapping in the 4.27 axles? Even if I do not have an O.D
     
  11. Dec 7, 2016
    oldtime

    oldtime oldtime

    St. Charles,...
    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    3,487
    My strong running standard 3B did better with 5.38 / O.D. vs. 4.88 / O.D.

    WWII military Jeeps were all 4.88 FDR.
    All CJ prior to 11/1962 were equipped with 5.38 FDR.
    4.27 FDR became the new standard FDR in November of 1962.

    Warn O.D. did not become a certified Jeep option until September of 1964.
    In 1964 Jeep specifically stated that the Warn O.D. was only to be used with 5.38 or 4.88 FDR.

    My info is taken directly from personal experience plus the original Service Bulletins concerning the standard ratio change and Warn O.D. as an Authorized Jeep Option.
     
  12. Dec 8, 2016
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,470
    I've done many 4cyl to V6 swaps over the years, mostly in flatties but a few 5s, and I have a formula that I like as it's part of an overall resto mod. I'll lay out what I'm doing with the '62 and some options that I'll be finishing by next summer.
    231 V6 (that's what I had that could be moved - you could use a 225 if you want does not change anything)
    T18 (or SM465 is what I put here)
    D18 with OD
    5.38 or 4.88 axles D27 front and D44 rear for 31s
    Disc front and 11" rear brakes
    Saginaw Manual fit for power
    Swinging pedal upgrade
    Rear Tank (can stay with stock under seat)

    I strip to the bare frame and clean up - set the drive train with the tub to get proper fit - Motor mounts and build cross member - hydro slave setup fab
    Put Steering and Cooling (swap Rad or refit old copper core setups) - box front frame horn, replace rad cross member and C channel front cross member
    Set pedals - I use Willwood pedals and MC units for brake and hydro clutch
    Set rear tank (custom build my own with EFI bungs and fittings - 1/8" steel tank) - body mod for rear fill
    Brake swap and drive-line fit (new drive-lines from Tom Woods)
    Build Cage and integrated Seat Mounts
    Finish body
    New Gauge Set and Wiring
    Test run(s) and then get ready to move it to a new home...

    This is the plan - about 70% done - some things you need others you don't - easy to copy and paste since I had it in my 'to do' sheet :)
     
  13. Dec 10, 2016
    Willys43

    Willys43 Member

    Kansa City
    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2016
    Messages:
    52
    Warlock, what swinging pedal assembly do you prefer?
    Craig
     
  14. Dec 10, 2016
    sterlclan

    sterlclan Member 2024 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    exploring the...
    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    3,892
     
  15. Dec 11, 2016
    Warloch

    Warloch Did you say Flattie??? Staff Member

    Falcon, CO
    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    5,470
    To use the Wilwood pedals like I do - I expand the 'hump' on the firewall of flatties so they fit better. I like the separate pedals, but may look at the dual setup and see how they fit one day.
     
  16. Dec 12, 2016
    Rick Whitson

    Rick Whitson Detroit Area 2024 Sponsor 2022 Sponsor

    I live South of...
    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2014
    Messages:
    1,732
    I have a 64 Tux and I bought a 66 V6 donor, I put the 3:73 axels with 10" breaks in mine with7.50 X 15 tires on it and it drives great. I can cruise at 55, on the highway, it will go faster, but why? I used the 66 frame, because it was in better shape, and had to put the 4 cylinder battery box on it, the motor mounts, and move the cross member forward. The holes were already in the frame for it. The drive shafts for the V6 are different, front longer the rear shorter, because the trans and transfer are moved back in the V6, there is a lot of work to make a four into a Dauntless V6. Good luck what ever you decide.
     
  17. Dec 12, 2016
    waynaferd

    waynaferd Hey, ya'll watch this!!

    That's Bangor,...
    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    224
    I grabbed a 71 donor with all the goodies and it has a cable for the clutch, not the same linkage like on my 55 it went into.....I even used the 71 crossmember and there's a bracket I had to weld to my frame outside for the cable to set in...overall not a lot of extra work and seems to be a slick set up

    71 also had dual master cylinder and larger brakes, so win win...actually swapped both axles and suspension

    I did have to cut off my 55s battery box as well

    Probably just throw on the 71s grill and radiator when I get that far
     
  18. Dec 12, 2016
    termin8ed

    termin8ed I didn't do it Staff Member

    Mason, MI
    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    4,422
    Jeep used 4.27 axles with the fheads BUT, they had the t90-c which had a lower 1st gear. It was basically as if you had 5.38 axles to start, but then once in 3rd 1:1, you had a better top gear.
     
  19. Dec 23, 2016
    windyhill

    windyhill Sponsor

    PA
    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,502
    Getting a donor cj5 and swapping over isn't that big of a deal, swap in a t-18 4 speed from a ford truck as well. v6 is a vast improvement. 4:27's are nice with a v6, unless you want to add an overdrive expence, I would go ideal setup 5:38's, OD, T-18 4 speed, stock spicer18, disc brakes up front or at least 11" drums all the way around. I don't have a problem with the stock pedals in the floor, it's one of the things that give it the vintage feel. Good luck.
     
New Posts